Judgment details
- Court
- General Court, Al-Namas
- Outcome
- Upheld on appeal
- Year
- 1435H
- Area
- Real Estate
- Official collection
- Collection of Judicial Rulings 1435H, Ministry of Justice (Research Center)
- Location
- Vol. 5 · p. 27
Summary
An applicant sought to prove title to land his father had revived before the cut-off; the municipality and finance objected, arguing the revival was recent. Title was proven by two upright witnesses and the experts' report, the objection was set aside, and the Court of Appeal upheld the judgment.
Principle
Revival before the cut-off date can be proven by credible testimony and expert evidence; a bare objection does not defeat it.
Text of the judgment as officially published
The text of this judgment is not yet reproduced on this site; it can be read in the official volume. Open the official volume
These summaries are general information to help you understand how courts approach issues. The judgments predate later laws such as the Civil Transactions, Evidence and Personal Status laws; every case turns on its facts and a past judgment is no substitute for a lawyer's advice.
Library content is simplified general information for awareness only. It is not legal advice and does not replace the official text. Laws change: always check the official source and consult a lawyer before acting. Library data last reviewed: .